Your access to this site is subject to certain terms and conditions. If you do not understand them or unconditionally accept them, then leave now.
Scroll to: USAΒ πΊπΈ | EconomyΒ π° | WorldΒ πΊ | Science/TechΒ π€ | MilitaryΒ π· | UkraineΒ πΊπ¦ | Comic ReliefΒ π€£
American government hates Ukrainians.
COVID patients should have been treated with antibiotics such as the off-patent ivermectin that were proved to be effective instead of ventilators plus useless under-patent antibiotics and later expensive untested non-standard vaccines. Hospitals were essentially bribed/coerced by governments for using ventilators and denying ivermectin, which ultimately caused the deaths of millions. The CDC admitted in court that they never really banned ivermectin but in all communications directed at doctors/hospitals and the public they effectively did the opposite. Many doctors were threatened/penalized with disciplinary action for effectively treating their patients with ivermectin.
Pfizer enjoys indemnity in the US under a series of pro-industry laws, and in the EU under confidential contracts signed by the pharma company and member states. The UK also granted Pfizer protection from legal action, changing the law to shield both the firm and healthcare staff administering the jab.
If government officials had given Pfizer blanket immunity, then they become criminally prosecuted for deliberately putting public safety at risk. Pfizer becomes criminally liable for prosecution because they colluded with government officials to hide safety data and also stifle public debate (including among doctors and researchers) about safety and effectiveness of their vaccine. WHO and government officials had changed the very definition of vaccine from providing immunity to preventing transmission to the now dubious "safety".
When a Russian politician dies, Putin is responsible. When an Ukrainian politician dies, complete silence.
They lowered standards⦠because having standards is racis.
COVID patients should have been treated with antibiotics such as the off-patent ivermectin that were proved to be effective instead of ventilators plus useless under-patent antibiotics and later expensive untested non-standard vaccines. Hospitals were essentially bribed/coerced by governments for using ventilators and denying ivermectin, which ultimately caused the deaths of millions. The CDC admitted in court that they never really banned ivermectin but in all communications directed at doctors/hospitals and the public they effectively did the opposite. Many doctors were threatened/penalized with disciplinary action for effectively treating their patients with ivermectin.
Pfizer enjoys indemnity in the US under a series of pro-industry laws, and in the EU under confidential contracts signed by the pharma company and member states. The UK also granted Pfizer protection from legal action, changing the law to shield both the firm and healthcare staff administering the jab.
If government officials had given Pfizer blanket immunity, then they become criminally prosecuted for deliberately putting public safety at risk. Pfizer becomes criminally liable for prosecution because they colluded with government officials to hide safety data and also stifle public debate (including among doctors and researchers) about safety and effectiveness of their vaccine. WHO and government officials had changed the very definition of vaccine from providing immunity to preventing transmission to the now dubious "safety".
American government hates Ukrainians.
When a Russian politician dies, Putin is responsible. When an Ukrainian politician dies, complete silence.
Created: 20 January, 2023 | Updated: 29 January, 2023
Check today's weather.